A
Visit By History
Robert
H. Jackson Center Hosts Exclusive Interview With Supreme Court Subjects
By
STEVEN M. SWEENEY
Without a doubt in their
minds, Gathie and Marie Barnett refused to recite the Pledge of Allegiance and flatly
refused to salute the American flag in their classroom.
Their Charleston, W.Va.,
elementary teacher promptly sent the girls both to the principalÕs office.
ÔÔ ÔWhy, doesnÕt your
teacher remember the Supreme Court decision?Õ ÕÕ Gathie Barnett Edmonds said,
recalling her principalÕs words.
At the Robert H. Jackson
Center on Friday, Mrs. Edmonds and Mrs. Snodgrass told their story — of going
to school, not saluting the flag and being sent home. It was an exclusive
interview the Jackson Center hosted with the Barnett sisters and Bennett Boskey,
law clerk for then-Chief Justice of the United States, Harlan Stone.
Apparently, the teacher
forgot the two girls had been the center of a lawsuit, the latest in a series
of hundreds, lodged by JehovahÕs Witnesses against government institutions
aimed at winning genuine religious freedom.
For almost four years from
1940, the United States officially compelled children to say the Pledge and
honor the flag — against the beliefs of many. After the decision in Minersville
School District v. Gobitis, historians reminded the packed house that JehovahÕs Witnesses
were specifically targeted by average fellow citizens who fired them from their
jobs, expelled them from schools and ransacked their congregating halls.
Fortunately the girls did
not see the worst of it.
ÔÔWe had some cousins that werenÕt
allowed on the school bus. The other children just kind of ignored us,ÕÕ Mrs.
Edmonds said. ÔÔWe had moved into Charleston in the meantime. Teachers didnÕt
really want us to come, my mother sent us anyway.ÕÕ
For the girls, the case was
suddenly finished. They only testified once, before a justice of the peace, ÔÔand
he ruled against us before had hardly been there,ÕÕ Mrs. Edmonds said. The case
was argued before the entire West Virginia court system and appealed by the
state Board of Education to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Essentially, West
Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, was a repeat of the Minersville case. Several justices on the court
had thought they had wrongly decided, especially after the violence that ensued.
Even in the heat of World War II, the judges thought suddenly it was primary to
protect all civil rights, not only the majorityÕs.
Chief Justice Stone had lead
the court turnaround after being the only dissenting voice in Minersville. Boskey said his one-time boss
would have written the courtÕs opinion but really wanted a different voice saying
it. Stone could not depend on four agreeing judges to write opinion narrowly enough
to keep all the votes together, so he chose one of the courtÕs newest members,
Robert Jackson.
ÔÔHe decided the best thing
to do for the court to get an opinion would be to subscribe the assignment to Justice
Jackson,ÕÕ Boskey said. ÔÔIf you read and reread the opinion ... it is written
with elegance and eloquence with application beyond its boundaries. I think it
is one of those cases that is not likely to be overruled.ÕÕ
After JacksonÕs opinion had
been distributed through the court for commentary, it was released to the
public. Mrs. Edmonds and Mrs. Snodgrass agreed conditions improved for them and
for the lot of all JehovahÕs Witnesses, and probably for many others to worship
and believe as they choose.
But commentators Friday couldnÕt
help but note the unusual irony of the date the Supreme Court handed down its
opinion on Barnette, June 14 — Flag Day.
The
Post-Journal
Saturday,
April 29, 2006
Vol.
179, No. 312
Section
A, Pages 1 and 3